Again, this is an issue that affects all disciplines within Revit, however with the added difficulties of applying Revit to landscape architecture, the learning curve can seem even steeper than average.

The second issue of longer implementation can be separated into two parts: it has a steeper learning curve and also requires substantial time to build a content library. However, with Autodesk moving all of its products over to subscription only, this might make the cost difference almost negligible. For comparison, AutoCAD is only $1,680 annually, but Revit is a bit different in that it is generally required to stay up-to-date with the latest version every year, while with AutoCAD you can easily get by without the latest version. Starting with the cost, a single Revit license is $2,000 per year. These two “issues” are prevalent in almost any BIM software, but might be slightly more acute with Revit.

From the outset, Revit has two immediate challenges that affect all disciplines (including architects, engineers, and landscape architects): greater software cost and longer implementation time. Like any software, Revit does have some drawbacks that might make it less appealing for some users. So in an effort to share more specific and useful information pertaining to BIM and landscape architecture, here are some of the biggest issues and challenges that I have discovered while using Revit, both generally and as a landscape architect. Yet the reasons behind this verdict are often left unexplained, which is not helpful for those who would like to understand more about Revit and the BIM process. It is less commonly used by landscape architects, and is frequently declared as “unsuitable” for landscape modeling. Revit is a fairly popular BIM platform, particularly among architects and building engineers. Anyone who is familiar with BIM and BIM software has almost undoubtedly heard of Revit.

Autodesk revit landscape architecture